Advantages And Challenges Of ExportingBy Tekle S.
7%-38%-55% Communications MythBy Robert P.
Top 10 Big Mistakes Of Big BusinessBy Francis T.
Climate Change Is Real! Act Now!By Kathrin G.
Improving The Quality Of Decision MakingBy Niladri R.
Advantages And Challenges Of ExportingBy Tekle S.
Top 10 Big Mistakes Of Big BusinessBy Francis T.
Best Practice Benchmarking - The Path To ExcellenceBy Robert C C.
What Is A Healthy Company?By Raymond H.
Challenges And Opportunities In The New EconomyBy Alkistis A.
Also Interesting ...
AML & Financial Crime Compliance Training - Quit 'Box Ticking'By Mark A.
A Different Kind Of Smart Is Changing The World Of BusinessBy David L.
Do You Have Eggs?By Rajesh V.
Top 10 Big Mistakes Of Big BusinessBy Francis T.
The Managers Role In Promoting Quality LeadershipBy Joy W.
What IT Leaders Do
Companies that rely on IT governance systems alone will come up short.
Something's gone very wrong with the structures, processes, and policies that govern how a business makes IT decisions and who within the organization makes them. Most companies have such frameworks?commonly referred to as IT governance?in place today. In the best cases these systems help IT and business managers work together to make smarter IT investments that deliver real value.
Despite these well-defined rules, IT and the business too often lack a common understanding of the company's basic objectives and have conflicting opinions about technology options and priorities. A good deal of research shows that this misalignment usually results in failed IT initiatives and high costs.1
The problem is that IT governance systems have become a substitute for real leadership. Companies are relying on tightly scripted meetings, analyses, and decision frameworks to unite CIOs and business executives around a common vision for IT. But committee meetings and processes are poor stand-ins for executives who can forge a clear agreement among their peers about IT investment choices and drive the senior-level conversations needed to make tough trade-offs.
For several reasons, leadership can achieve what governance systems by themselves cannot. First, IT leaders earn the trust of their business colleagues, often by demonstrating that they understand the company in business terms, by examining IT options as business investments (rather than as technology solutions), and by managing the IT function as a business?using business metrics to quantify results, for example.
Trusted, credible leaders articulate a vision for IT's role in the company and ensure that this vision is clearly understood by managers throughout the organization. They inspire other executives to pursue new IT-enabled business opportunities and have enough clout to keep managers focused on the right issues and on making the most effective decisions.
Governance systems by their nature lack the focus, energy, and high-level attention that an individual leader can provide. Meetings and rules can't make executives trust each other?trust is built at a personal level. Processes can't command the attention executives give to trusted peers. In some companies, for instance, business leaders send delegates to technology committee meetings; they would never shrug off a meeting with a respected colleague, however. Systems alone don't forge common visions or inspire action; without a leader, governance systems are like a vehicle without an engine.
In companies with strong IT leaders, governance constitutes a much more flexible set of managerial activities, involves fewer people and fewer meetings, and is typically tailored to fit the IT leader's style, much as executive committee activities often reflect a CEO's leadership approach.
As companies turn their attention to growth and place bets on new IT investments, they can no longer allow systems to substitute for strong IT leadership. The executive team must be more creative about identifying leaders, helping them succeed, and redesigning governance systems to support these leaders rather than to compensate for their absence.
A tale of two banks
Consider the case of one large European bank: the effectiveness of its IT strategy was being undermined by a leadership vacuum. The head of retail banking was pushing hard for new systems and processes to improve customer relationships, the CEO wanted to consolidate operations across organizational boundaries, and the CIO's top priority was to renew the bank's core applications and systems.
The bank had a clearly defined IT governance structure in place for resolving exactly this kind of alignment issue. A committee of business and functional executives followed a step-by-step process for analyzing and reviewing IT options and setting priorities. But the bank still lacked a clear vision for IT's role in supporting the bank's overall strategy. The committee weighed the relative merits of the options against one another rather than using a common understanding of general priorities to assess each initiative. The committee was simply not capable of becoming the driving force in resolving these conflicting senior agendas. How could it be? It would be like asking a nation's legislative body to act as a leader. In the end, the CIO hijacked the process to push his IT agenda forward.
In stark contrast, at another European bank competing agendas are resolved by an IT leader (in this case, the CIO) with the clout to get executives to discuss options and reach a consensus?even if it isn't the decision they would make on their own. More important, the bank has fewer major conflicts over IT investments, because the CIO has effectively integrated a common vision for technology with the corporate strategy, thus avoiding lengthy debates about which investments are desirable.
The CIO has clout because he earned it. He is regarded as a peer by the other executives; he understands the bank's businesses and thinks about them in the same way the other executives do; he uses their language; he thinks about initiatives as business options (not technology ones) and assesses them with the appropriate metrics; and he understands the constraints of the businesses and works within them. For instance, he's careful to plan, sequence, and finance necessary investments within the constraints of the bottom line of each business unit.
At this second bank, IT governance is less formal and therefore far more effective than at the first one. Because the CIO has excellent working relationships with the business leaders, they use personal discussions to make quick decisions collectively rather than resorting to formal meetings. This approach has enabled the CIO and his executive colleagues to consolidate several committees at different management levels into a single executive IT council that understands the bank's IT strategy and makes investment decisions accordingly.
Our analysis of the IT decisions at these two banks highlights a very clear message. The bank with an IT leader makes business-focused IT decisions that have helped increase its earnings each quarter and are supporting revenue growth in core businesses. In contrast, the bank relying on governance processes to act as a "ghost leader" has stalled; costs are high and transformation is slow.
Lead IT governance?don't be led by it
In companies with strong IT leaders, the IT governance structures are more efficient and streamlined and less bureaucratic than in companies without such leaders. Over time, leaders figure out what tasks can be achieved through relationships and what must be accomplished through more formalized assessment and decision-making processes. The balance varies, of course, depending on the leader's style, the top team's chemistry, and the specific processes required to get things done.
An efficient process typically gives the executive IT committee the space to solve higher-value problems. One company's executive council, for instance, focuses on detailed analyses of how to implement new investments with maximum speed in order to reap the expected benefits as soon as possible. In particular, the council examines how to communicate its IT decisions to employees throughout the organization's business and IT-management ranks.
Some companies streamline IT governance even further, by integrating it with existing business governance processes. At one European insurance company, the executive committee that makes most of the major business decisions also handles IT. The executive team believes this approach is more effective because IT choices aren't viewed as separate and parallel to business decisions but as one aspect of them.
Unfortunately, many other companies try to solve the problems that stem from a lack of leadership?incoherent IT strategies, competing agendas, missed opportunities for the businesses to leverage IT, misalignment and miscommunication between IT and business managers?by ladling on more governance. These companies assume that greater alignment and better IT decisions would result from clearer rules, more meetings, different people at the meetings, more rigorous analysis of business cases, or more forms and checklists.
They are wrong; additional IT governance measures don't work and instead often exacerbate the problems. When one European financial-services company tightened its governance procedures, for instance, business executives became even more disaffected and participation plummeted. At another company, governance has evolved into a mammoth system of checks and balances, involving long, arduous meetings and multiple committees?a process intended to allow managers to question or defend the business case for new investments aggressively.
IT governance can always improve, but never enough to compensate for a lack of IT leadership; there is no substitute for the sheer power of having leaders who trust and respect each other. Indeed, IT leaders trump governance alone in three other important respects.
Leaders address issues that governance misses
Companies structure their governance systems to decide whether to increase or cut investments in technology. They rarely use these processes to examine the broader questions regarding IT value that leaders routinely confront: what is the role of IT? How do we measure and improve the impact of IT on the business? What innovations should we be exploring? What strategies are our competitors pursuing? And what constitutes best practice?
Leaders accommodate different executive styles; governance doesn't
Some business leaders prepare for IT committee meetings by getting input and advice from their own managers and by reflecting on how they operate in their own domains. Others prefer going over issues and potential options with the CIO. Some executives delegate responsibilities to trusted subordinates; others wish to exert total control by conducting personal reviews after the official IT committee has met and then making a decision. Leaders understand these stylistic differences and accommodate them. In many companies, however, governance is a process that doesn't allow for much flexibility?rules restrict when and how decisions are made, and business leaders are expected to fall into line.
Leaders are accountable
Executives routinely accuse IT of managing projects poorly or of failing to translate business needs into IT solutions. IT, for its part, often blames business for a lack of involvement and quality input. Leaders must be accountable where governance isn't; the buck stops with them.
The way forward
True IT leadership is rare. It results only from a deliberate effort by the executive team?and often in reaction to specific circumstances. At one company that had grown through serial acquisitions, for instance, the top team concluded that strong IT leadership was needed to bring coherence to the company's fragmented systems. In other cases, IT leaders emerged at companies that depended increasingly on performance outside their home market or where the CEO integrated IT into the company's management culture.
The common denominator is that the executive team must take responsibility for finding an IT leader and then commit to making that person successful. Three lessons emerge.
1. Hire creatively
Too often, CEOs and their top teams rely on stereotypes about who should lead IT. Finding the right person with the necessary skills isn't easy, since the role is fraught with paradox. An IT leader must be a businessperson who understands IT: an executive?like the CEO?who can create change but who individually may not have the clout within the organization to make things happen, and who is a peer of business leaders yet respected as "one of us" by the IT staff.
CEOs sell their companies short by searching solely for CIOs to fill this role. Banks in North America and Europe have asked chief financial officers or chief operating officers to lead IT. One large global energy company rotates business executives into the role for a set period to ensure both that someone with business skills runs IT and that the business units are then seeded with IT-savvy managers.
2. Help IT leaders succeed
The IT leader must be part of the executive team to get results and to build the necessary relationships and credibility within the company. CIOs who are perceived to be operating managers?not leaders?rarely sit on the management committee and often report to executives other than the CEO. The solution isn't to clear space at the table for an operating manager; instead companies should search for an IT leader who adds value to the management team.
Obviously, the IT leader needs the right resources to succeed, but an explicit mandate within the company?including a role in the decision-making process?is equally important. The management team may opt, for example, to give the IT leader veto rights over any project that isn't compatible with the company's IT architecture. One European telecommunications company made the IT leader its process architect. Business and functional leaders still operate the processes but must convince the IT leader in order to change them.
3. Create the conditions for aligning IT and business
Alignment won't come about simply from discussions between IT and business units. Instead, clear frameworks for decision making and alignment must be forged within these boundaries. The company's strategy should be specific enough for IT and business leaders to discuss trade-offs rather than debate what the strategy means, for example.
In some cases, performance frameworks help to align business and IT. One telecommunications company, for instance, uses business rather than technology metrics to review and compensate its IT leader.
The difference between companies with strong IT leaders and those that use governance as a substitute for leadership is striking (exhibit). Executive teams with a strong IT leader make better, faster decisions about technology than do companies that rely solely on a governance system?no matter how effective it is.
About the Authors
Eric Monnoyer is a principal and leads McKinsey's IT practice in France. He specializes in IT performance management and is based in Paris. Paul Willmott is a principal in McKinsey's global IT practice and specializes in IT organization and governance. He is based in London.
This article was first published in the Fall 2005 issue of McKinsey on IT.
Got an opinion? Want to thank Albert?
54 more Articles by Albert
6 min. Valuable insights on using your speaker to maximise the success of your event
15 min. The CEO helps a transformation succeed by communicating its significance, modeling the desired changes, building a strong top team, and getting personally involved.
28 min. Surprisingly, many organizations lack a proper succession plan. One reason is that they do not have an effective succession planning process. This author ...
8 min. Gen X-ers want far more collaboration with companies - both as customers and as employees. CIOs are uniquely positioned to help their enterprises meet ...
13 min. Of all the findings on business strategy yielded by the study of the businesses in the PIMS? database, the following is one of the most controversial: ...
7 min. Sometimes we can all use a friendly reminder to keep us from backsliding into old ways of thinking about selling that lead us down the wrong path with potential clients.
16 min. Services are more difficult to measure and monitor than manufacturing processes are but executives can rein in variance and boost productivity - if they implement rigorous metrics.
POP18 min. Looking for inspired leadership, passionate employees, unsurpassed productivity, and grateful customers? Forget the dispirited corridors of corporate ...
8 min. Foresee the future, that's what your customers expect, that's what you need to deliver.
31 min. There appears to be plenty of room for much greater effort and involvement by companies and organizations around the world. Here a few thoughts and pointers.
POP10 min. To get beyond survival and to grow both profits and margins, the successful companies of the future will be forced to become true customer experts.
3 min. Over the last two years of working with hundreds of clients from all walks of life, I have noticed trends of what my clients want and need. This top ten ...
12 min. Value created by knowledge is often not captured. Five accounts of knowledge strategies.
15 min. Operational risks are costly, but they can be conquered when high-ranking executives join the battle.
9 min. The global talent war has seen organisational leaders scratching their heads to understand how they can attract and retain the very best talent that is ...
5 min. Should work be fun? Must it be fun? Today, the answer to these questions is mostly yes. What else should it be? Yet however plausible this answer might ...
16 min. For GCC states, liberalizing the labor market and developing the local workforce are the keys to moving beyond a reliance on foreign workers.
POP6 min. Two of today's buzzwords are Team and Teamwork. Those with a particular desire to conform to the spirit of the age portray them as the polar opposite of ...
6 min. Once companies reach a certain size, setting realistic performance aspirations gets a bit trickier.
17 min. Over the next two decades, the country's middle class will grow from about 5 percent of the population to more than 40 percent and create the world's fifth-largest consumer market.
4 min. "Size is no guarantee of future success." What is strategically important is strength not size. Speed is more important than physical mass and flexibility ...
8 min. Organic search engine optimization has some distinct advantages over pay-per-click advertising. However, there are undoubtedly certain situations and scenarios ...
11 min. Lean Thinking is a highly evolved method of managing an organization to improve the productivity, efficiency and quality of its products or services. The ...
9 min. Complexity has been one of the most frequently used words for some years now. People talk about complex systems, complex interrelationships, complex problems ...
6 min. Trying to perfect a flawless presentation can result in disaster...
13 min. Employees' personal connections can be as valuable as their individual knowledge base. Social network analysis, or SNA, helps maximize a company's collective smarts.
4 min. The proliferation of brands and channels is forcing companies to restructure their marketing efforts significantly.
9 min. The success of strategic investments depends largely on the subsequent moves of competitors. Uncertainty about competitive conduct can lead executives ...
20 min. What is success, what is failure, and how can you improve your odds for success?
POP19 min. The art of leading deep corporate change can be learned. The trick is to help each member of the company discover a new reality...
4 min. US Recruiting, Retaining & Developing Talent Statistics & Best Practises
11 min. Reasons Why You Should Speak at and Attend Professional Seminars
3 min. The aim of this guide is to prepare you for discussions with a bureau, and to get you thinking about all the factors that affect your Facilitator choice.
6 min. Plenty are the professionals who are on the "front lines" of the industry, knowledgeable of the countless changes, and who are willing and able to speak ...
21 min. Are you on board with enterprise risk management? You had better be. It's the future of how businesses will be run.
15 min. By building social issues into strategy, big companies can recast the debate about their role in society.
POP19 min. Eight emerging trends are transforming many markets and businesses. Executives should learn to shape the outcome rather than just react to it.
5 min. Improving the customer-centricity of your organization isn't just good business, it's also good marketing.
8 min. Companies based in the GCC states are using their petrodollars to expand into global markets. But in the long run, these companies will have to develop distinctive capabilities and skills.
15 min. Further reform will be essential if one of the world?s fastest-growing regions is to seize a broader role in the global economy
POP11 min. Somewhere in Corporate America, a human resources manager is tweaking her company's employee-incentive program. Maybe she's dumping last year's customized ...
13 min. The days, weeks, or months between taking the job and assuming power are precious. Put them to good use.
4 min. Few companies have the skills to effectively manage procurement across all spending categories. Smart enterprises should examine their procure-ment strategies ...
11 min. Growth is necessary, but size is no guarantee of a successful future! Nevertheless, growth is needed. Without growth there is no life. In a certain sense, ...
13 min. Everything that we do for our clients is based on the idea that improved communications will improve an organisation's performance and contribute to the ...
14 min. Newspapers have tried a host of measures to halt the long-term decline in their readership, but they haven't stopped consumers from turning to TV and the ...
7 min. In 15 seconds, a visitor to your site determines whether or not they are interested in your product or service. Web usability experts can provide all sorts ...
17 min. How leading-edge companies are streamlining applications development.
POP4 min. Recently, I came across a code of ethics for hackers (yes, it really does exist) that I'd like to share with you, because I think it really hits home with ...
4 min. How do you know if the speaker fits? How do you avoid embarrassing mismatches?
13 min. Talent can be bought, but the best companies develop their own.
17 min. An organization is much more likely to improve its current performance and underlying health by using a combination of complementary practices rather than ...