Expertbase Articles by Albert Einstein Team Building We Need Teamwork - But Is It The Only Useful Form Of Work?
Advantages And Challenges Of ExportingBy Tekle S.
7%-38%-55% Communications MythBy Robert P.
Top 10 Big Mistakes Of Big BusinessBy Francis T.
Climate Change Is Real! Act Now!By Kathrin G.
Improving The Quality Of Decision MakingBy Niladri R.
Advantages And Challenges Of ExportingBy Tekle S.
Top 10 Big Mistakes Of Big BusinessBy Francis T.
Best Practice Benchmarking - The Path To ExcellenceBy Robert C C.
What Is A Healthy Company?By Raymond H.
Challenges And Opportunities In The New EconomyBy Alkistis A.
Also Interesting ...
Six Successful Habits To Increase Productivity And Your Client BaseBy Charles M.
The Ideal Project Manager SpecificationBy Richard M.
Who Do You Talk To?By Graham Y.
How To Prevent Email OverloadBy Carole S.
Managing Bad Debt - Importance Of Good Collection SkillsBy GERARD A.
We Need Teamwork - But Is It The Only Useful Form Of Work?
Two of today's buzzwords are Team and Teamwork. Those with a particular desire to conform to the spirit of the age portray them as the polar opposite of individual achievement, which embodies everything that is bad and "out", whereas teamwork is good and "in".
Teamwork has been one of the most frequently used expressions in management for some time. Almost without exception, the word is meant positively; teams and teamwork are regarded not merely as forms of work necessary under certain circumstances or as one of several possible options but as the only desirable form of work. Teams are considered in principle and in general to be superior to the individual. The team is viewed as good, efficient, creative and successful per se. That all sounds rather nice. Unfortunately, though, there is not a shred of evidence that this assumption is correct.
Not that there is no need for teamwork. Yet this has always been the case. What is so new about it that requires special emphasis; and what makes it so difficult that it must be learnt and practised separately? What is more, how can one justify the dogmatism associated with it, which chooses to see it as the only form of useful work?
What is so difficult about teamwork?
Since humans have existed, cooperation has been a matter of course in daily life. What is called a team today is the basic form of any social structure whatsoever. It is virtually the constitutive element of society, namely the cooperation of people in different variations in order to cope with life, whether it be the various forms of the family, the prehistoric pack of hunters, the tribal community, the rural farming community, the handicraft business, the village community and so forth. Nobody could have survived without cooperation; Robinson Crusoe is only a novel.
For this reason, it was never a problem for anybody to work in and as a team with others. Nobody needed to be taught it; nobody needed to learn it as a special discipline. Life, as it existed, happened in teams; life was teamwork. Hence teamwork has scarcely merited a mention from historians. Surely one has never encountered passages like this: "...and then the Assyrians invented the team...".
Yet what we are increasingly confronted with today are senseless forms of organisation and impracticable types of labour division, which prevent almost any productive work or make it inhumanly difficult at any rate. For example, anybody who has to work in a matrix organisation - mostly introduced too quickly, indiscriminately and without proper consideration - must have the kind of abundance of teamworking ability that is only seldom encountered and cannot as a rule be produced, however much training is given. It is therefore much better, more effective and more economical to modify the organisation.
The purpose of organisation is not to make work difficult for people. On the contrary, it is supposed to make it easy to work. By not imposing performance-hindering organisations on people, one will quickly observe that most of them can cooperate rather well with each other, without any major problems - precisely because that is one of the quite normal abilities of ordinary people - and that there are no particular requirements for teamwork training.
Nobody would have the nonsensical idea to demand that people drive a car, play a musical instrument or compete at chess as a team. People know that tasks of this kind, if they are to have any chance of success and efficiency - or even brilliance - can be performed only by individuals and that no amount of team training would lead even to mediocre achievements. It is clear that the performance of a symphony requires teamwork and no musician particularly needs to be told this. However, it does not follow from this that the trumpet is blown by a team.
If one were to configure the positions and tasks in management with the same care exercised by the great composers in the construction of the individual voices of a symphony, teamwork would not be an issue or - more precisely - it could be relied upon that ordinary people quite naturally bring with them everything they need to work together. Teamwork would be no problem. Yet no amount of training will achieve the opposite: to compensate for the mistakes in the job design and in the organisation through team training.
What is the truly great accomplishment?
The things that people need to be able to do in order to work together can thus be presupposed under sensibly designed conditions. But what about the really outstanding accomplishment? Is the real peak achievement - the great creative task - not a matter for the team? Would the ordinary teamworking ability of ordinary people still be sufficient for that task? Or should special training not be applied here now?
Many great achievements, especially those commonly referred to as breakthroughs, were accomplished by individual people, sometimes by individuals with assistants but virtually never by teams. There are no team compositions in music, nor any works of literature that were produced by teams; team painting is not a known art form, nor did any of the great sculptors actually work in a team.
Contrary to widespread opinion, this also applies to science to such a great extent that it should be taken seriously. The great works of philosophy, mathematics, the sciences and the humanities were, with a few exceptions, created by individuals.
Teams are tools, just like individual work. One must neither factor out one of these forms of work nor should one put it on a pedestal. The way in which to work - which form of work is the best - must be determined by the task and not by dogma.
In the world of organisations, tasks must be configured in such a way that they can be performed by ordinary people (because there is no other kind) who have ordinary abilities (because others cannot be learnt).
Corporations that want to achieve results have to master both things: teamwork and individual achievement, each where it fits.
What's your opinion?
54 more Articles by Albert
11 min. Growth is necessary, but size is no guarantee of a successful future! Nevertheless, growth is needed. Without growth there is no life. In a certain sense, ...
6 min. Plenty are the professionals who are on the "front lines" of the industry, knowledgeable of the countless changes, and who are willing and able to speak ...
POP4 min. Recently, I came across a code of ethics for hackers (yes, it really does exist) that I'd like to share with you, because I think it really hits home with ...
6 min. Valuable insights on using your speaker to maximise the success of your event
11 min. Lean Thinking is a highly evolved method of managing an organization to improve the productivity, efficiency and quality of its products or services. The ...
13 min. Of all the findings on business strategy yielded by the study of the businesses in the PIMS? database, the following is one of the most controversial: ...
13 min. The days, weeks, or months between taking the job and assuming power are precious. Put them to good use.
15 min. Further reform will be essential if one of the world?s fastest-growing regions is to seize a broader role in the global economy
4 min. The proliferation of brands and channels is forcing companies to restructure their marketing efforts significantly.
16 min. Services are more difficult to measure and monitor than manufacturing processes are but executives can rein in variance and boost productivity - if they implement rigorous metrics.
8 min. Organic search engine optimization has some distinct advantages over pay-per-click advertising. However, there are undoubtedly certain situations and scenarios ...
15 min. Operational risks are costly, but they can be conquered when high-ranking executives join the battle.
POP19 min. The art of leading deep corporate change can be learned. The trick is to help each member of the company discover a new reality...
15 min. The CEO helps a transformation succeed by communicating its significance, modeling the desired changes, building a strong top team, and getting personally involved.
20 min. What is success, what is failure, and how can you improve your odds for success?
3 min. Over the last two years of working with hundreds of clients from all walks of life, I have noticed trends of what my clients want and need. This top ten ...
31 min. There appears to be plenty of room for much greater effort and involvement by companies and organizations around the world. Here a few thoughts and pointers.
13 min. Employees' personal connections can be as valuable as their individual knowledge base. Social network analysis, or SNA, helps maximize a company's collective smarts.
5 min. Should work be fun? Must it be fun? Today, the answer to these questions is mostly yes. What else should it be? Yet however plausible this answer might ...
12 min. Value created by knowledge is often not captured. Five accounts of knowledge strategies.
4 min. Few companies have the skills to effectively manage procurement across all spending categories. Smart enterprises should examine their procure-ment strategies ...
17 min. How leading-edge companies are streamlining applications development.
4 min. "Size is no guarantee of future success." What is strategically important is strength not size. Speed is more important than physical mass and flexibility ...
9 min. The success of strategic investments depends largely on the subsequent moves of competitors. Uncertainty about competitive conduct can lead executives ...
POP18 min. Looking for inspired leadership, passionate employees, unsurpassed productivity, and grateful customers? Forget the dispirited corridors of corporate ...
POP10 min. To get beyond survival and to grow both profits and margins, the successful companies of the future will be forced to become true customer experts.
6 min. Once companies reach a certain size, setting realistic performance aspirations gets a bit trickier.
POP19 min. Eight emerging trends are transforming many markets and businesses. Executives should learn to shape the outcome rather than just react to it.
4 min. US Recruiting, Retaining & Developing Talent Statistics & Best Practises
28 min. Surprisingly, many organizations lack a proper succession plan. One reason is that they do not have an effective succession planning process. This author ...
7 min. Sometimes we can all use a friendly reminder to keep us from backsliding into old ways of thinking about selling that lead us down the wrong path with potential clients.
8 min. Gen X-ers want far more collaboration with companies - both as customers and as employees. CIOs are uniquely positioned to help their enterprises meet ...
13 min. Talent can be bought, but the best companies develop their own.
14 min. Newspapers have tried a host of measures to halt the long-term decline in their readership, but they haven't stopped consumers from turning to TV and the ...
8 min. Foresee the future, that's what your customers expect, that's what you need to deliver.
9 min. Complexity has been one of the most frequently used words for some years now. People talk about complex systems, complex interrelationships, complex problems ...
13 min. Everything that we do for our clients is based on the idea that improved communications will improve an organisation's performance and contribute to the ...
11 min. Reasons Why You Should Speak at and Attend Professional Seminars
6 min. Trying to perfect a flawless presentation can result in disaster...
12 min. Companies that rely on IT governance systems alone will come up short.
3 min. The aim of this guide is to prepare you for discussions with a bureau, and to get you thinking about all the factors that affect your Facilitator choice.
4 min. How do you know if the speaker fits? How do you avoid embarrassing mismatches?
17 min. Over the next two decades, the country's middle class will grow from about 5 percent of the population to more than 40 percent and create the world's fifth-largest consumer market.
16 min. For GCC states, liberalizing the labor market and developing the local workforce are the keys to moving beyond a reliance on foreign workers.
17 min. An organization is much more likely to improve its current performance and underlying health by using a combination of complementary practices rather than ...
8 min. Companies based in the GCC states are using their petrodollars to expand into global markets. But in the long run, these companies will have to develop distinctive capabilities and skills.
21 min. Are you on board with enterprise risk management? You had better be. It's the future of how businesses will be run.
15 min. Five easy-to-use tools help negotiators in complex deals arrive at a negotiating position that is not only acceptable to them but also palatable to other ...
15 min. By building social issues into strategy, big companies can recast the debate about their role in society.
POP11 min. Somewhere in Corporate America, a human resources manager is tweaking her company's employee-incentive program. Maybe she's dumping last year's customized ...
7 min. In 15 seconds, a visitor to your site determines whether or not they are interested in your product or service. Web usability experts can provide all sorts ...
5 min. Improving the customer-centricity of your organization isn't just good business, it's also good marketing.