Coaching In Management - Essential Business Skill Or Temporary Fad?
Read in 18 min. There continues to be massive coverage in the press just now about how effective the skill of coaching can be both in the workplace and in people's personal lives. Can a manager employ coaching skills to further the performance and general motivation and morale of their employees?
A Business Trainer from
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Allan is available for projects both virtually and in-person.
My experience as a specialist coach and manager has shown me that coaching used correctly and appropriately can indeed transform an employee's performance and as a result can also ensure that the employee remains motivated and loyal to their manager and company. Managers who coach effectively tend to have more stable, motivated and productive teams.
At this point it is essential for me to emphasise that coaching is only part of the manager's role and that the challenge for management is to ensure that all the differing aspects of management are built into the role. It is fine for me to promote the skill of coaching but without the other aspects of management then a manager would not be fully effective and would not last long in their role.
Recruitment, performance management, financial management, business planning and customer engagement are just a few of the skills that a manager needs if they are to be successful. A manager must ensure that they get the balance of all skills right in order to continue to be successful. Being a successful coach does not guarantee managerial success. I know, I've been there!
The challenge for coaching is that in the years I have been coaching business people, I see managers struggling to cope with coaching, both in terms of taking the skills on board and also of taking the time to put them into practice. I've encountered weird and wonderful excuses as to why managers don't or won't coach.
"It's easier and less time consuming to tell them what to do" is one common 'reason'.
"I am here to manage, not to coach" is another reply I have heard.
Probably the worst comment I heard was, "These people do not deserve a coach".
Training courses have helped to give people some initial exposure to the skill of coaching, although the challenge is that once the course is over, is there any qualified coaching support available to ensure follow-up? If there is no follow up to the course then the chances of the coaching skills being retained are slim and many managers will revert to their 'old' 'directive' ways, particularly when under pressure or stress.
I would like to quote Sir John Whitmore from his book 'Coaching for Performance'
"... the hunger for coaching has resulted in hastily and inadequately trained managers, or so called coaches, failing to meet the expectations of those they are coaching. In too many cases they have not fully understood the performance related, psychological principles on which coaching is based ..."
How true! And in my own case, in my early managerial days, VERY true! I was thrown into coaching at a time of extreme organisational change. Training was given and although some of it stuck, the majority of it was lost in the "need to get things done", task-orientated culture that the organisation I worked for at the time had. It was only until I experienced expert coaching from an external independent coach that I realised and experienced the power of good coaching. It had taken me thirteen years of numerous managers before I experienced the effects of excellent coaching. It really did change the way I looked at life and also the way I approached it. I also became far more productive than I had been previously.
The longest journey starts with the first steps. So, with regards coaching what should these be. You need to clarify in your own mind, exactly, what is coaching in a management context?
We are all aware that there are coaches in sport and sometimes that is where the initial confusion starts. A lot of coaches in sport are actually not true coaches, they are trainers. Trainers can tend to shout a lot, they direct, they pass on advice, advice usually based on their own knowledge and experience. Good coaches are self-aware; they listen intently, question appropriately and challenge assumptions and actions. They will direct, but only when appropriate, and they only use their own knowledge and experience when they know it will move their employees forward.
In my own experience one of the main differences between a good coaching manager and a directive trainer/manager is that the manager does not make judgments and does not let ego get in the way!
Coaching aims to enhance the performance of others through feedback, motivation, effective listening and questioning. Above all, coaching aims to enable the employee to do it for him or herself! The aim of coaching is to ensure positive action which leads to success.
A good manager will realise, though that coaching is not used in very employee - manager interaction and that depending on the employee's motivation and skill level, more directive approaches should be used. However in order to coach effectively a manager must learn to listen more and be prepared to ask questions to gain full understanding as opposed to jumping to conclusions. They must also learn to 'hold their tongue' and not dive in with advice.
There are many opportunities for managers to use their coaching skills. A sales manager will carry out field (sometimes called 'support' or 'progress') visits and within these the manager can use coaching skills to support the sales person to build sales skills and also to enhance their influencing skills with customers. Office based managers can hold progress reviews, development meetings, team meetings and the annual appraisal with these just a few examples of where good coaching skills can come to the fore and ensure motivation and progression of the person being coached. The manager who says they do not see the opportunity for coaching or perhaps doesn't have the time for it, needs coaching themselves!
When coaching is needed, the capable manager should be able to utilise coaching models such as 'GROW' and 'OUTCOMES' in order to coach effectively.
* Coaching is an essential business skill.
* Many managers do not possess the appropriate skills or do not use them as often as they should.
* Coaching is only part of the manager's role and should be used in balance with the other skills.
* Managers should fully understand what coaching is about and what it entails before embarking on using the skills.
* There are plenty of opportunities to coach in a manager's everyday role.
Implementing coaching in Organisations:
5 Essential Steps
I have been fortunate enough to be actively and heavily involved in the implementation of a company wide coaching programme, both as an employee who was to receive coaching but also as a manager and coach who was expected to regularly coach my reports and my peers to enable them to achieve their objectives. I say, fortunate enough, because I found that when I was coached effectively I became really motivated and focused, and when I finally became a proficient coach, I again found it motivational in that I was able to support and enable my direct reports to achieve more.
There were though many pitfalls along the way to achieving total acceptance of coaching as a skill that not only motivated but also enabled employees to become more capable and productive. There are I feel some necessary steps an organisation must take in order to ensure that they implement a coaching programme effectively. Looking back now to that two year programme, I feel that although we made great progress we also made some mistakes which I would encourage organisations to be aware of when deciding to go down the 'coaching' route.
1. Ensure coaching starts at the top and is supported by the 'top'!
Many organisations are recognising that coaching is a skill that all managers of people and teams must possess. However, many organisations only concentrate on ensuring that 1st and perhaps 2nd line managers are trained in the skill. Suddenly middle or junior managers become skilled in coaching but never experience the power of coaching from their own senior management. In relation to ensuring that everyone who will be involved in the coaching programme 'buys-in' to the coaching philosophy they need to hear that the 'top' executives are committed to coaching both in terms of promoting the skill but also to be seen to utilise the skill themselves in that they are coached and that they coach their own direct reports. In other words everybody has to 'walk the talk'.
In my last organisation before going self-employed this was not the case. A few senior members of the Board and a couple of key HR personnel promoted the skill of coaching well and 'practiced what they preached'. Unfortunately some very senior managers did not and continued to use very directive behaviours towards their staff whilst communicating that coaching was a 'fad' that would soon pass! This caused confusion at middle management levels with the result that a number of managers did not take their coaching training very seriously. Fortunately other managers did and their teams eventually experienced the benefit.
2. Will everybody understand what coaching is and what it can do them?
This was one of the first hurdles that we had to overcome. Simply, people did not understand why the organisation was implementing such a programme and also people did not fully understand what coaching was exactly. Some believed it was training and that all it meant was that you told people what to do and showed them how to do it. After all that was what their sports coach did! Others thought it was more about counselling and you only used coaching when there was a deep problem causing under-performance. All in all not everyone had a good understanding of what coaching was and how it differed from the likes of training, mentoring and counselling. Also many people because they had not been exposed to effective coaching had no experience or idea of why coaching could be a benefit for them; either as the coach or as someone being coached. Before employees can move on and take part in a coaching programme they must be 1005 aware of what the skill of coaching entails and what it can do for them.
3. Those who are going to act as coaches must be trained effectively.
Most companies will take on the services of a training provider or consultant to support them to implement the coaching programme. Beware. Make sure you do your homework! There are numerous coaching schools, training companies and consultancies who now offer 'coach training'. Some will be excellent; some not so hot. We had some major problems with the group that we used in that not all their trainers/coaches had the necessary skill and experience with the result that not everyone in the organisation received the same quality of training and coaching. I was extremely lucky in that I had an excellent coach who was also a fantastic trainer.
What should you look for when selecting a coaching training company or consultancy?
The most important thing to look for in selecting a provider company is to ensure that you are comfortable that you can form a powerful and productive partnership with them. There are a number of questions you should be asking in order to ascertain this.
* What is their experience of supporting coaching programmes? (Years of experience, types of situations, companies worked with, references)
* What is the experience of the individual consultants? Business backgrounds? Coaching experience? Coaching Qualifications? Any experts within the ranks? (There are a lot of 'life coaches' now offering corporate manager-coach training and many do not come from a corporate background. Although this does not mean they won't be good coaches, it may mean that their credibility in the eyes of the trainees/coachees might not be all it could be, and this could present problems)
* What coaching models does the provider use? Do they stick to one model or are they able to utilise a number of coaching models which they can fit to the purchasing company?
* How flexible is the provider? It is all very well putting together a coaching programme to satisfy an initial proposal but are they able to flex this programme as befits the needs of the organisation as they go through the programme? Flexibility is key in any coaching programme as not everything will go to plan and not everybody will progress at the same pace!
* Does the provider offer variety of interventions within the programme? A good provider will ensure that the programme is varied with it being a mix of classroom theory, role-play and other experiential practices together with assignments, action plans, review days not forgetting 1:1, group and telephone coaching support.
* Are they prepared to ensure that they measure their success and agree with you what exactly success looks like? If they are not then forget them!
* Are they affordable? Some companies and consultancies charge very high rates and deliver excellence and are value for money. Some are the opposite and some charge very reasonable rates and are also excellent. The main point is that you should also do your sums and make sure you can afford the programme because it could last a fairly long time, particularly if you are a large organisation.
Coach training takes time and although there are some very good two to three day courses available the real secret to establishing and reinforcing coaching skills is to ensure that once the basic theory is learned, these skills are immediately put into practice. A good coach training provider will always offer follow up support either in the form of review days, 1:1 coaching, group coaching (action learning sets) and telephone coaching support. Having said all this in many instances it will depend on the budget available but whatever the situation please ensure that you do your homework on the outfits that you have singled out in your tendering process. If your managers and coaches do not get the required and proper training then the whole coaching programme could collapse before your very eyes.
4. Ensure that those who are doing the coaching have some form of measure.
Firstly it was my experience that although everyone went through the coach training not everyone was prepared to go away and start coaching! Reasons for this were varied. Some cited too much pressure of work and not enough time; others simply outlined that they didn't believe coaching would work for their reports; some stated that they were already coaching, whilst others decided that they needed to coach more because they now believed that this was the way to motivated and up skill their staff. The end result was that although some managers had a strong motivator to coach, others did not. How did we get round this challenge? Well we got half way there, in that in every manager's measures of performance there was an objective around how much time would have to be spent on a one to one basis with individuals in their teams. This at least got people to make sure they put time in their diaries in order for this to happen. However this was only half the battle as it was no guarantee that within this dedicated time, the manager would actually do any coaching! What I believe should have happened (and what I now believe is happening) is that the manager on a regular basis now asks for feedback on their coaching skills from the people they are coaching. Each coachee will have a list of the competencies and behaviours that an excellent coach should exhibit and every so often the manager will ask the coachee for feedback on these. Only by taking both the objectives and feedback approach will you ensure that coaching is taken seriously.
5. Regularly review progress against agreed measurement and success criteria.
Finally the success of the coaching programme overall should be measured. As with any training intervention it is not always that easy to measure how successful the intervention has been. Sure, the feedback following the course was great and the trainer/coach was superb, but did any lasting change happen and did this result in improved behaviours and subsequent improvement in productivity?
Organisations should look to both qualitative and quantitative measures where possible. Qualitative measures include written feedback about how the coachee or employee feels about the coaching - do they feel more focused, more motivated, has morale improved, do they look forward to their coaching sessions etc. Qualitative measures though do not always satisfy senior management who, in many respects, do not respect 'happy sheet' feedback. What they want is hard evidence based on data and results. If they do not get this then suspicion about how effective the interventions often occurs and future investment in such 'soft skill' ventures can be difficult to access.
Where possible if you are looking to demonstrate a return on the investment then you should look to measuring outputs such as sales or production; look at sickness rates, employee retention rates together with improvements in individual competency ratings where possible. We were constantly being pressured and challenged to prove a return on the huge investment that the company had made and although we struggled in the early days to prove that coaching worked we eventually gathered together enough quantitative data to prove our case.
In Summary, in order to support your organisation to successfully implement a coaching programme at all levels the do the following:
1. Get 'Buy-In' from the top and ensure they are committed to the skill of coaching and that they lead by example. Others will follow.
2. Make sure everyone involved understands why coaching is being implemented, what coaching is and how they as individuals will benefit' not only as a coach but as someone being coached.
3. Choose your coach training providers very carefully. Are they experienced coaches? Can they train effectively? Do they have a list of satisfied clients? Do they provide ongoing follow-up support?
4. Are there enough motivators in place for managers to coach? Is coaching part of their specific objectives and are they being measured on these objectives? Are they asking for feedback on their skills?
5. Make sure you put both qualitative and quantitative measures in place and that you review these regularly, always remembering to communicate these to senior stakeholders.
Another important point is that all this takes time. If you think you can implement a coaching programme in a matter of weeks then think again. You will need time to get the support of senior management; time to put a training plan together and then time to implement that training plan. Then there should be a re-inforcement and sustainability period when the newly found skills are being implemented and developed through feedback. Time should also be put aside to ensure feedback is collected and measurement against the success criteria is monitored and communicated. Give at least six months to a year for your implementation and then be prepared to continually assess and develop the skills on an ongoing basis.
Coaching programmes are lengthy and can be exhausting given the continual training, monitoring and influencing of stakeholders, but ultimately they are very worthwhile as the organisation and its people grow as a result.
A manager who only possesses a 'directive' or a 'do as I say' approach will eventually commit managerial 'suicide' as they will lose total respect and trust from their team members. Managers must learn to coach and use their coaching skills appropriately and skilfully. In order to learn to coach properly, managers must start to learn to actively listen more, question more accurately, coach using a framework, and offer praise and support. Managers have many opportunities to support their team members through coaching such as field visits, 1:1 reviews or through appraisals and if they utilise these opportunities they will see their team members grow and be more productive.
Organisations can support their managers by ensuring that they implement a structured and comprehensive coaching development programme. One off one or two day coaching courses may seem to help initially but if there is no follow up, then there may be little return on the training investment.
Whitmore, John. Coaching For Performance (Nicholas Brealey Publishing Ltd; 3Rev Ed edition (12 Mar 2002)
Your thoughts matter - more than you can imagine.
More Articles by Allan 11 Free | Ad-Free | Full-Text Business Papers
Team BuildingA major advantage a team has over an individual is its diversity of resources, knowledge, and ideas. However, diversity also produces conflict. As more ...
Human ResourcesIf managers can demonstrate the skills and are not afraid to trust their employees, then peer appraisal can work for both manager and the team, and work ...
Sales - SpecialisedAs marketplaces and customers change then the move to account management is to be welcomed but is the move enough to really capture increased sales and market share?
Organisational DevelopmentOrganisations, both large and small, seem guilty of not giving new managers the support that they deserve. So, why is this?
Team BuildingAfter extensive research (of my own personal, and others' motivations) I have discovered that in order to produce 'self motivation' in others, a manager should concentrate on four key factors.
MotivationFailure to deal with under-performance will lead to major team discontent and if under-performing employees are left to continue to under-perform then ...
Sales - GeneralThe visit of a sales manager to a sales executive out on their 'territory' should be an opportunity for growth and development for the executive, the sales ...
Team BuildingWhat are the challenges that managers face in developing their teams and what can be done to support them?
Team BuildingUnfortunately, many managers do not get the necessary training or coaching in this area of team development and as such teams go through a lot of stress ...
Presentation SkillsThe best presenters I have seen concentrate fully on the audience, engaging them with both the content, their energy and their enthusiasm. Some of the ...
Performance ManagementIn many ways there are no secrets to implementing effective performance management. Performance Management is a process and a process which if implemented ...
More 'Coaching' Articles
13 more Articles that may interest you, too...
It is widely agreed that coaching is a much-misunderstood concept and it is perhaps not surprising that many myths have sprung up around the subject. Can you see any truth in the following for example?
Continuing his series of articles on the importance of motivation to the coaching approach, Matt outlines how the complexity of motivation can be broken down and made managable and how different types of motivation may be classified.
It has been said that there is no such thing as difficult employees, only ineffective managers, but I've yet to meet anyone who believes that's true. In the end, if people want to be difficult that's there choice, but recognizing that the way we manage such people is part of the mix here's a selection of tried and tested techniques:
The comparing of coaching to other forms of workplace development that my previous articles have dealt with has helped us understand coaching relative to other approaches, but this article seeks to refine our understanding of coaching in absolute terms.
These are difficult times. Commercial organisations are faced with empty order books, lack of cash or capital and shrinking markets. The public sector too is finding its resources shrinking as there is simply not the finance expected even a year ago.
"Coach me? If I wanted counselling I'd ask for it thank you!" This article examines the confusion between coaching and counselling and how we can make our intentions clear to avoid statements like this.
By Graham Y.
Who tells the boss that they can improve their management or leadership? How do they look at themselves objectively and identify what areas they can improve and the benefits of doing so?
By Jon E.
Human capital and organizational development strategies that systematically use developmental coaching to uncover and nurture latent and potential capacity can provide a better means to cultivate organizational futures.
By Graham Y.
Some differences and grey areas where Coaching or Mentoring overlap
By Dianne B.
The importance of anchoring coaching to business strategy and goals
By Francis T.
Leading edge thinkers are thinking about BCS (Business Coaching Sessions). If the world is really about faster, cheaper, better, then BCSs are a perfect response to this question: How can I get more out of the increasingly limited time I have to invest in personal and professional development?
Rapport is a somewhat exotic English word derived from the French verb rapporter, meaning to bring back, to refer. The English meaning, a relation of harmony, conformity, accord or affinity, indicates the importance of rapport to communication and consequently coaching. This article examines what coaches need to know.
Ask anyone to define the word coach and you will get a wide variety of responses. Some will say coach is a sort of tutor or instructor, but others will say it's a large, multi-wheeled railway carriage. Unfortunately, the second definition is about as helpful as the first in deciding what coaching at work is all about.