Knowledge, Awareness And Understanding
Read in 5 min. Knowledge Management has focused on the management of information and knowledge in the belief that if we have more knowledge, better quality knowledge and more accessible knowledge then we will do our jobs better. This is simply not true!
A Business Trainer from
Fleet, United Kingdom
David is available for projects both virtually and in-person.
Lets say we had perfect information and knowledge - all stored in a single, large, easily accessible database. Lets say we also had experts with perfect knowledge who were readily available and with whom we could easily talk. Perfect! What ever we wanted to know, we could obtain. It was there at our fingertips. Would it really make that much difference?
Let me give you a quote from Michael Schrage:
"I think "knowledge management" is a bullshit issue. Let me tell you why. I can give you perfect information, I can give you perfect knowledge and it won't change your behavior one iota. People choose not to change their behavior because the culture and the imperatives of the organization make it too difficult to act upon the knowledge. Knowledge is not the power. Power is power. The ability to act on knowledge is power. Most people in most organizations do not have the ability to act on the knowledge they possess. End of story."
Or lets put it another way - as a business development manager from BT in a KM presentation observed to me:
"Knowledge Management should be about liberating people to think - not all this technology stuff".
Or a more down to earth comment still from a business consultant I invited along to a recent KM conference:
"David - this KM business is really just a load of rubbish. It does not address the quality of the decision-making! What is the point of having all this KM stuff in place if people still make lousy decisions - or if they don't use it or if they do the wrong thing - even exceptionally well? They would do better to do the right thing very badly and not bother with KM at all!"
Or again from a different angle - recently in the Culture section of The Sunday Times I found a fascinating article on creative writing by the author Joanna Trollope. This is how the article starts:
"I am always fascinated by the idea of creative-writing courses. I completely accept that you can teach the craft, that you can give instruction how to structure a book, how to vary the pace and tension, how to write dialogue. But what you can't teach, it seems to me, is the right kind of observation or the right kind of interpretation of what has been observed. It worries me to think of all those earnest pupils who have diligently mastered the mechanics, wondering with varying degrees of misery and rage why the finished recipe just somehow hasn't worked."
Yes we can have information, yes we can have knowledge and yes we can have mastered the mechanistic skills to do our jobs but then why do we still screw up?
The problem is that we focus too much on the mechanics of business life and in Joanna Trollope's words - not enough on "observation and interpretation" or in my words not enough on "awareness and understanding"
In short, even if we made perfect knowledge available there is no guarantee that we will understand it any better or make wiser decisions or put it to productive use.
The problem is that we 'tune out' what we don't wish to hear. We ignore information that does not seem relevant or does not fit our preconceived ideas. We assume we have the answers and look no further. We refuse to talk to other people in case they question our decisions. We override them when they do. In short we are arrogant and ignorant and not blissfully not aware of it.
There are no single solutions to problems such as these but one element is too often missed and that is the role of conversation.
There are two barriers to conversation. First, we do not listen to each other. Second, we do not say what we think. We do not tell the 'truth' ? we do not effectively communicate our different perceptions. If we wish to improve our knowledge and make it productive there is one fundamental thing that we need to learn to do and that is to converse openly. This will raise our awareness and our understanding of our organizational world and all that follows will benefit.
But let me leave you with one last quotation from David Weinberger -one of the authors of The Cluetrain Manifesto ?
"But the real problem with the information being provided to us in our businesses is that, for all the facts and ideas, we still have no idea what we're talking about. We don't understand what's going on in our business, our market, and our world.
In fact, it'd be right to say that we already *know* way too much. KM isn't about helping us to know more. It's about helping us to understand. Knowledge without understanding is like, well, information."
So, how do we understand things? From the first accidental wiener roast on a prehistoric savannah, we've understood things by telling stories. It's through stories that we understand how the world works."
Your thoughts matter - more than you can imagine.
More Articles by David 1 Free | Ad-Free | Full-Text Business Papers
Knowledge ManagementIf knowledge management is to have any real impact on the way we do business and not just a passing fad then it has got to be about making radical changes ...
More 'Knowledge Management' Articles
5 more Articles that may interest you, too...
Value created by knowledge is often not captured. Five accounts of knowledge strategies.
Collaborate Today And Compete Tomorrow - Managing Key Knowledge In Inter-Organisational Alliances Or Networks
By Frank D B.
When aircraft manufacturer Airbus signed a cooperation deal recently with a visiting Chinese delegation headed by Prime Minister Wen Jiabao commentators were somewhat suspicious. China, which is recognised as being highly successful in acquiring the technologies it lacks, has imposed clear rules: penetration of its market depends on investment that is likely to develop the Chinese aerospace industry. In this context, Airbus President and Chief Executive Officer Gustav Humbert said that technology transfer will be necessary to achieve industrial cooperation. "The question is, how much of the latest technology are you able to transfer?" he said. "You have to make sure that you are the master of the newest technology and not give away technology which might work against you tomorrow, with competitors copying you later."
By David G.
If knowledge management is to have any real impact on the way we do business and not just a passing fad then it has got to be about making radical changes in the way that we perceive and utilise knowledge. It needs to be about creating new knowledge, applying knowledge and in the words of Peter Druker "making it productive". In other words knowledge management needs to fundamentally focus on creativity and innovation.
Employees' personal connections can be as valuable as their individual knowledge base. Social network analysis, or SNA, helps maximize a company's collective smarts.
By Vernon P.
Knowledge management is based on the assumption that the potential for sustained improvement exists in the knowledge derived from people, processes, designs, and ideas within the organisation. It also implies the creation of a culture and structure that will overcome barriers to communication and promote information sharing and learning.